Aerospace Engineering Get in touch

Hrishikesh
Lahudkar

Aerospace
Engineer

I'm an aerospace engineer who works where structural analysis meets the shop floor. From Abaqus models of a Mylar airship envelope to faster production of aero-engine brackets, I like problems that have to fly and have to be built.

Built to

carry load

CapabilitiesAerospace engineer across analysis, design, systems and manufacturing

Structural analysis (FEA)Nonlinear Abaqus models, checked against hand calculations

Aerodynamics and CFDAnsys Fluent, XFLR5 and AVL; aerofoil selection and stability

Systems engineering (MBSE)SysML, requirements, mass and power budgets, V&V

Materials and processesTitanium, aluminium and CFRP; selection in Ansys Granta

Manufacturing and qualityAS9100, root cause analysis, DMAIC, value-stream mapping

Design and CADCATIA, SolidWorks and AutoCAD; drawings and GD&T

Based Leeds, UK MSc Aerospace Engineering, University of Leeds BTech Production Engineering, VJTI Mumbai

Airbus A380-800" by Nobilis 2, CC BY 4.0, via Sketchfab

Scroll to board

Skip intro

(01)

Selected work

01 MSc Research

A buoyancy-driven indoor blimp that flies without propellers

MSc dissertation, University of Leeds. 2026

57 gTotal vehicle mass
51.86 MPaPeak stress at the anchor, 10 N pull
±6.4°Pitch in the sawtooth glide
7.4 hEndurance on a 100 mAh battery

Rotor drones can only fly for minutes inside tanks, pipelines and test chambers, and they aren't safe near people. I designed a 57 g helium blimp that moves by changing its own buoyancy instead. A micro-pump fills a 50 mL ballonet to make it heavier and pitch it nose-down; venting does the opposite, so it glides in a sawtooth path. Two nose-to-tail lines on a single servo steer it.

The envelope is a GNVR shape, 1008 mm long and 336 mm in diameter, made from eight heat-sealed gores of 15 µm Mylar. Its 59.3 L of helium lifts 61.3 g, a 4.3 g margin over the vehicle's mass.

In Abaqus, using about 32,700 shell elements, the envelope at 200 Pa averaged 1.63 MPa, within 25% of the 2.24 MPa hoop-stress hand calculation and a factor of safety of about 54. The steering-line anchor was the critical case: a 10 N pull gave a 51.86 MPa local peak and a factor of safety of only 2.3, so I specified bonded reinforcement doublers at every anchor.

A six-state longitudinal model in MATLAB, integrated with fourth-order Runge-Kutta, settled into a stable sawtooth cycle: ±6.4° of pitch at an average 35.8 cm/s, covering 204 m in ten minutes. The duty-cycled energy budget gives about 7.4 hours on a 100 mAh battery.

The prototype is built, and a first ceiling-suspended test reached the commanded ±10° of roll. Free flight is the next step.

ToolsAbaqus, MATLAB, ANSYS Fluent, CAD, heat-sealed Mylar fabrication

0 m −2 m

Pitch now: 0.0°±6.4° pitch, 35.8 cm/s mean speed

A replay of the MATLAB result at six times real speed, with the vertical scale exaggerated. With a 45 mm pendulum the pitch swing roughly doubles and the speed overshoots the 60 cm/s design line.

02 Autonomous Delivery Drone

Sizing the propulsion for a hexacopter delivery drone

MSc team design project, University of Leeds. Four-person team, Oct to Dec 2025

18 kgMaximum take-off mass
8.76 kg/m²Disk loading on six 26-inch rotors
1.45 kWHover power at a figure of merit of 0.72
99 minIdeal hover endurance

Rotor drones can only fly for minutes inside tanks, pipelines and test chambers, and they aren't safe near people. In nuclear facilities they add further risks: rotor downwash can stir up contaminated dust, and a crash can damage equipment in areas people can't easily enter. I designed a 57 g helium blimp that moves by changing its own buoyancy instead. A micro-pump fills a 50 mL ballonet to make it heavier and pitch it nose-down; venting does the opposite, so it glides in a sawtooth path. Two nose-to-tail lines on a single servo steer it.

The envelope is a GNVR shape, 1008 mm long and 336 mm in diameter, made from eight heat-sealed gores of 15 µm Mylar. Its 59.3 L of helium lifts 61.3 g, a 4.3 g margin over the vehicle's mass.

In Abaqus, using about 32,700 shell elements, the envelope at 200 Pa averaged 1.63 MPa, within 25% of the 2.24 MPa hoop-stress hand calculation and a factor of safety of about 54. The steering-line anchor was the critical case: a 10 N pull gave a 51.86 MPa local peak and a factor of safety of only 2.3, so I specified bonded reinforcement doublers at every anchor.

A six-state longitudinal model in MATLAB, integrated with fourth-order Runge-Kutta, settled into a stable sawtooth cycle: ±6.4° of pitch at an average 35.8 cm/s, covering 204 m in ten minutes. The duty-cycled energy budget gives about 7.4 hours on a 100 mAh battery.

The prototype is built, and a first ceiling-suspended test reached the commanded ±10° of roll. Free flight is the next step. Because it flies slowly, quietly and without propellers for hours at a time, the platform could suit indoor nuclear inspection, such as reactor halls and decommissioning sites, where it would keep people out of radiation areas.

ToolsMomentum theory, MotoCalc, power and mass budgets, bill of materials

  • Thrust per rotor29.4 N
  • Disk loading8.76 kg/m²
  • Induced velocity5.92 m/s
  • Hover power1.45 kW
  • Hover endurance99 min
Propeller diameter (in) Hover power (kW) 22 32 0 3.2
Ideal momentum theory corrected by figure of merit, sea-level air and a 2,403 Wh battery used in full with no reserve. The defaults reproduce the report's baseline.

03 International Competitions

AIAA DBF 2024, Wichita, USA

AIAA Design/Build/Fly 2024, Team Vayuputras, VJTI. Aerodynamics and Stability lead, May 2023 to April 2024

89.43Design report score
7thWorldwide ranking
GOE 430Aerofoil chosen from a three-way shortlist
16.5–20.5%Static margin across missions

The 2024 brief was urban air mobility: an aircraft under a 5-foot span flying timed humanitarian missions with passengers, a patient gurney and a medical cabinet, scored on speed, payload and the design report.

I led aerodynamics and stability for the 22-member team. We screened candidate aerofoils in XFLR5 at Reynolds numbers up to 430,000, shortlisted SD7062, GOE 387 and GOE 430, and chose GOE 430 for its gentle stall and high maximum lift. Static margins were set for each mission, between 16.5% and 20.5%.

Alongside the analysis I worked on the design in CATIA, SolidWorks and AutoCAD and coordinated manufacture and flight testing: nine flight attempts across two prototypes. Our design report scored 89.43 and ranked seventh in the world.

ToolsXFLR5, AVL, CATIA, SolidWorks, AutoCAD

4.0°

Lift coefficient: 0.67

An interactive illustration using a NACA 2412 section as a stand-in for GOE 430. The lift coefficient is a thin-aerofoil estimate and ignores stall.

04 Aerospace Manufacturing

Cutting Cycle Time On Aero-Engine Bracket Production

Industrial placement, Godrej Aerospace, Mumbai. Jul to Dec 2024

52%Cycle-time cut on drilling and chamfering
4Operations studied with time studies
42 → 28 dLead time, current to proposed
60 → 75%Value-added share, proposed

The bracket cell makes titanium and nickel-alloy brackets for aircraft engines. I ran a DMAIC study with time studies on four operations, separating value-added work from waiting, searching and handling.

The changes were practical: 5S storage so sheets are sorted by material and thickness, standardised cooling times between welds, a foot-operated air gun for faster part changeover, and gauges kept at the point of use. Cycle time fell on every operation studied.

I also mapped the current-state value stream for a product family and proposed a future state projected to cut lead time from 42 to 28 days and lift the value-added share of work from 60% to 75%. Alongside this, I supported shop-floor non-conformance investigations to AS9100.

ToolsTime study, DMAIC, value-stream mapping, 5S, Westinghouse rating, GD&T

Cycle-time reduction by operation

  • Laser cutting12.7%
  • Dot peen marking23.0%
  • Welding24.6%
  • Drilling and chamfering52.1%

Lead time, current and proposed

  • Current state42 d
  • Proposed future state28 d
Results measured after the improvements were put in place. The future-state lead time is a projection from the value-stream proposal.

05 Coursework

Crushing and Deploying a Vascular Stent in Abaqus

MSc coursework (MECH5680M), University of Leeds. Two-person team, 2025/26

1.13 NForce to crush the stent to half its diameter
0.41%Reaction-force change between the two finest meshes
12.6×Stiffer if plasticity is ignored
1.72%Recoil after balloon deflation

A vascular stent has to pass bench tests and then expand inside an artery without springing back. We modelled both in Abaqus/Standard as nonlinear static analyses with contact.

For the bench test, a half-symmetry model crushed the stent between rigid plates to 50% of its diameter, meshed with C3D10H quadratic tetrahedra. A mesh study across four element sizes converged to within 0.41% in reaction force. With an elastic-plastic material, the full stent needed about 1.13 N. A purely elastic model predicted 14.24 N, more than twelve times stiffer, with peak stresses of several gigapascals, which shows why plasticity has to be modelled.

For deployment, we placed the stent inside an idealised artery, modelled with a third-order Ogden hyperelastic law, and expanded it with a balloon of membrane elements. After inflation and deflation the stent held its shape with 1.72% recoil. Changing the stent's yield stress by ±20% moved recoil between 1.3% and 2.1%, and a second study tested how the vessel's stresses depend on its stiffness.

The 3D viewer below uses the meshes from our Abaqus input files. Its motion is a schematic based on the load steps and reported results.

ToolsAbaqus/CAE 2023, nonlinear static analysis, contact, elastic-plastic and hyperelastic materials, mesh convergence

Loading the Abaqus mesh…

The meshes come from our Abaqus input files. The motion is a schematic driven by the load steps and reported results; the force readout follows the report's elastic-plastic curve. Drag to rotate.

(02)

Experience and education

  1. Sep 2025 to Sep 2026

    MSc Aerospace Engineering

    University of Leeds

    Modules: Advanced Finite Element Analysis, Design Optimisation, Aerospace Systems Engineering, Aerospace Structures, Advanced Aerodynamics, Rotary Wing Aircraft, Surface Engineering and Coatings, and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

  2. Feb 2025

    Remote pilot training

    Airbus Group India, Bengaluru

    A DGCA-approved RPAS course covering drone rules and airspace zones, principles of flight for fixed-wing, multirotor and hybrid aircraft, meteorology, pre-flight inspection and maintenance, and emergency procedures such as loss of link, GPS failure and motor failure. Certified to fly small-category drones within visual line of sight.

    Remote pilot training
  3. Jul to Dec 2024

    Industrial Placement, Aerospace Manufacturing

    Godrej Aerospace, Mumbai

    Lean and quality improvement in the bracket cell, described above, plus non-conformance support to AS9100 and a study of worker skill rating.

    Industrial Placement, Aerospace Manufacturing
  4. Dec 2021 to May 2025

    BTech Production Engineering

    VJTI, Mumbai University. UK first-class equivalent

    Modules: Industrial Engineering (including materials requirements planning), Supply Chain Management, Work Study and Time Study, Lean Manufacturing, Product Management and CAD-CAM-CIM.,

Contact

I'm looking for graduate roles in aerospace sector and in structures, design and manufacturing. The quickest way to reach me is by email.

hrishikesh.professional23@gmail.com